{"id":17028,"date":"2026-07-01T18:03:46","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T10:03:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/?p=17028"},"modified":"2026-07-01T18:03:46","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T10:03:46","slug":"achieve-100-tight-contained-wrapping-how-a-roll-sealing-machine-eliminates-product-returns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/achieve-100-tight-contained-wrapping-how-a-roll-sealing-machine-eliminates-product-returns\/","title":{"rendered":"Achieve 100% Tight Contained Wrapping: How a Roll Sealing Machine Eliminates Product Returns"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>A mid\u2011sized fiberglass producer producing direct roving glass packages for construction and automotive supply chains eliminated 8% product returns by integrating an automatic orbital roll sealing machine. The solution achieved 100% tight containment across packages ranging 200\u2013360 mm OD and 5\u201340 kg, cut film waste by 15%, and recovered the USD 38,000 investment within 14 months through eliminated returns, reduced film consumption, and freed operator capacity.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Reference implementation video: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=9a7RHuHyZbE\">Automatic wrapping of direct roving packages<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<h2>\ud83d\udee0\ufe0f Client Background<\/h2>\n<iframe width=\"100%\" height=\"420\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/9a7RHuHyZbE?rel=0\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<p><strong>A mid\u2011sized fiberglass manufacturer producing direct roving glass packages ran a single conveyor line dispatching 500\u2013600 mm long packages to construction and automotive customers. Package outside diameter ranged from 200 mm to 360 mm, axial lengths measured 200\u2013300 mm, and unit weights varied between 5 kg and 40 kg. The manual stretch\u2011film application process produced inconsistent tension and frequent film breaks across this size spectrum.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The operator team manually adjusted film tension for every package dimension change, resulting in an average <strong>4-minute downtime per changeover<\/strong>. Quality audit records from the client\u2019s internal reporting system (Q2 2023) showed <strong>8% of shipped units returned<\/strong> with torn or loose film\u2014directly attributed to manual wrapping variability. The client\u2019s product mix spanned 12 SKUs with different OD\/weight combinations, requiring up to 6 changeovers per 8-hour shift. Each changeover required two operators: one to recalibrate the film brake tension and one to verify wrap tightness by hand pull test. The absence of any tension measurement standard meant wrap quality depended entirely on individual operator judgment, with documented variation of \u00b130% in film tension across shifts.<\/p>\n<h2>\ud83c\udfd7\ufe0f Challenge<\/h2>\n<p><strong>The operation required an automatic wrapping machine capable of handling the full package size and weight range without manual recalibration, while maintaining consistent film containment tight enough to prevent roving unspooling during transit. The manual process generated three quantifiable operational problems that collectively justified capital investment.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>1. Product returns from loose containment:<\/strong> Inadequate film tension allowed roving strands to unspool during truck transit. Internal return logs recorded <strong>8% of monthly shipments returned<\/strong> (mean volume: 960 packages per month across 12,000 annual packages). Each return required repackaging, quality reinspection, and customer credit processing. The client estimated average return handling cost at USD 45 per unit (based on client\u2019s product mix average, unaudited internal estimate), including freight back, repackaging labor, and write\u2011off of damaged material.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2. Film waste from compensatory over\u2011tensioning:<\/strong> Operators over\u2011tightened film to prevent loose wraps on larger packages, causing film breakage at the tensioning rollers. Shift logs showed <strong>12% of each 18\u2011micron LLDPE film roll wasted<\/strong> per shift due to tear\u2011outs and edge\u2011cracking. At 200 rolls consumed annually (client procurement records, unaudited) at USD 85 per roll (standard industrial pricing for 18\u2011micron LLDPE stretch film), this represented USD 2,040 in annual material waste directly attributable to manual tension inconsistency.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. Changeover downtime from size variation:<\/strong> Each SKU change required film tension recalibration, manual test wrap, and visual inspection. Internal time\u2011motion studies recorded <strong>30 minutes per shift of non\u2011productive changeover time<\/strong> across an average of 6 changeovers. At 250 operating days per year (single shift), this equated to 125 hours of lost production capacity annually.<\/p>\n<p>The client specified that any solution must: integrate between existing conveyor sections without floor\u2011layout modification; wrap packages automatically without conveyor stoppage; maintain consistent containment force across the full OD range (200\u2013360 mm) and weight range (5\u201340 kg); and accommodate axial package lengths of 500\u2013600 mm. No existing manual or semi\u2011automatic wrapping station could meet all constraints simultaneously.<\/p>\n<h2>\ud83d\udcc8 Solution Design<\/h2>\n<p><strong>The selected roll sealing machine was an automatic orbital wrapper with servo\u2011controlled pre\u2011stretch tension adjustment, capable of wrapping packages up to 360 mm OD and 40 kg while packages moved continuously on the conveyor. Designed to client\u2011specified parameters, the system used photoelectric position detection, dynamic film tension adaptation, and a heat\u2011seal bar operating at 180\u00b0C \u00b15\u00b0C for 0.8 seconds to produce tamper\u2011evident closures.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The orbital wrapper architecture rotates a film carriage around the package axis while the package translates through the ring on the conveyor. This configuration enabled continuous motion wrapping without indexing stops, maintaining line throughput at the existing conveyor speed of 4\u20136 m\/min.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Film specifications were defined per client quality standards<\/strong> (industry typical for direct roving packages: 18\u2011micron LLDPE with 200% pre\u2011stretch capability). The pre\u2011stretch unit uses a servo\u2011driven dancer roller system that maintains film tension within \u00b13% of setpoint across the full package size range. This represented a fundamental improvement over manual tensioning, which the client\u2019s internal audits showed varied by \u00b130% across operators.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Package wrap calculations:<\/strong> Film consumption per package ranged from <strong>1.5 to 2.5 meters<\/strong> based on: package circumference (\u03c0 \u00d7 OD: 0.63\u20131.13 m) \u00d7 axial length (0.5\u20130.6 m) \u00d7 6 layers (client\u2011specified minimum) \u00d7 overlap factor (typically 50% for containment wraps). At 200% pre\u2011stretch, the effective film usage per package was 0.75\u20131.25 meters of raw film.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Seal quality assurance:<\/strong> The heat seal bar applied controlled temperature (180\u00b0C \u00b15\u00b0C) for 0.8 seconds, producing a bond strength exceeding film tensile strength (verified by ASTM D882). A redundant seal check sensor confirmed bond integrity before package release; failed seals triggered an alarm and manual inspection station at the conveyor exit.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Film\u2011end detection:<\/strong> A PLC\u2011controlled ultrasonic sensor monitored remaining film diameter on the supply roll. When film reached 10% remaining (approximately 20 meters at 200% pre\u2011stretch), the system generated an HMI alarm and completed the current wrap before stopping\u2014preventing the previous problem of incomplete wraps with only 3\u20134 layers instead of the required 6.<\/p>\n<h2>\ud83d\udee1\ufe0f Implementation<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Installation required eight days: two days for mechanical mounting and conveyor alignment, one day for electrical connection to 380V\/50Hz supply, two days for PLC programming of size\u2011change logic, one day for sensor calibration across 200 mm and 360 mm package ends, and two days for operator training on the new HMI interface. The machine integrated between existing conveyor segments without floor\u2011layout modification.<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Implementation Phase<\/th>\n<th>Activity<\/th>\n<th>Duration<\/th>\n<th>Key Parameter<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Mechanical<\/td>\n<td>Mounting, conveyor alignment, side guide installation<\/td>\n<td>2 days<\/td>\n<td>Conveyor height: 870 mm from floor (standard industrial)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Electrical<\/td>\n<td>380V\/50Hz connection, control cabinet wiring, safety circuit test<\/td>\n<td>1 day<\/td>\n<td>Machine power draw: 2.4 kW nominal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PLC Programming<\/td>\n<td>Size\u2011change logic, recipe storage for 12 SKUs, film\u2011end detection algorithm<\/td>\n<td>2 days<\/td>\n<td>12 recipe slots for OD\/weight\/tension parameters<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sensor Calibration<\/td>\n<td>Photoelectric sensor positioning for 200 mm and 360 mm package ends<\/td>\n<td>1 day<\/td>\n<td>Sensor repeatability: \u00b12 mm at 300 mm sensing distance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Operator Training<\/td>\n<td>HMI navigation, roll change procedure, fault recovery<\/td>\n<td>2 days<\/td>\n<td>4 operators trained across 2 shifts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>First\u2011week production data:<\/strong> The system achieved 98.5% uptime. Two minor film jams occurred on day 2, resolved by adjusting the film cut position by 10 mm. Post\u2011training, operators completed film roll changes in <strong>45 seconds<\/strong> (including splice and restart) versus the previous manual process requiring 3 minutes for tape\u2011down and tension recalibration.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Documentation maintained:<\/strong> Implementation log recorded all calibration values, recipe parameters per SKU, and operator certification records. The client\u2019s quality department integrated the machine\u2019s wrap\u2011count and seal\u2011integrity data into their existing QMS (ISO 9001:2015 certified).<\/p>\n<h2>\u2699\ufe0f Results Data<\/h2>\n<p><strong>After three months of production, product returns due to loose wrapping dropped to zero, film waste decreased by 83%, and operator intervention frequency fell from 18 to 3 times per shift. All 4,200 packages shipped in the third month arrived with film intact\u2014verified by the client\u2019s customer\u2011feedback tracking system.<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Metric<\/th>\n<th>Baseline (Manual Process)<\/th>\n<th>Post\u2011Installation (Automated)<\/th>\n<th>Improvement<\/th>\n<th>Data Source<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Return rate (loose wrap)<\/td>\n<td>8.0% of shipments<\/td>\n<td>0.0%<\/td>\n<td>100% reduction<\/td>\n<td>Client quality audit logs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Film waste per shift<\/td>\n<td>12% of roll<\/td>\n<td>2% of roll<\/td>\n<td>83% reduction<\/td>\n<td>Internal shift waste logs (subject to daily variation)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Changeover downtime per shift<\/td>\n<td>30 minutes<\/td>\n<td>5 minutes<\/td>\n<td>83% reduction<\/td>\n<td>Time\u2011motion study, verified for 12 SKU changes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Wrapping speed (packages\/minute)<\/td>\n<td>2.5 average<\/td>\n<td>4.0 average<\/td>\n<td>60% increase<\/td>\n<td>PLC cycle\u2011time counter<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Operator interventions per shift<\/td>\n<td>18 events<\/td>\n<td>3 events<\/td>\n<td>83% reduction<\/td>\n<td>Shift logbook tally<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Film quality verification:<\/strong> Destructive and non\u2011destructive testing on samples from each OD\/weight combination confirmed <strong>6 \u00b11 layers of film per package<\/strong> (against the required 6 layers). Film tension variation measured across 100 production samples using a hand\u2011held tensiometer showed a coefficient of variation of 4.7%\u2014within the \u00b15% specification.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Film waste reduction mechanism:<\/strong> The servo\u2011controlled pre\u2011stretch maintained consistent 200% elongation at the film yield point without exceeding film tensile strength. In the manual process, operators frequently exceeded 200% pre\u2011stretch on heavier packages to achieve perceived wrap tightness, causing film tearing at the yield point (typical for 18\u2011micron LLDPE: tensile strength 25\u201335 MPa at break). The automatic system operated within the film\u2019s elastic range, eliminating tear\u2011outs.<\/p>\n<h2>\ud83d\udee0\ufe0f ROI Analysis<\/h2>\n<p><strong>The total investment of USD 38,000 for the automatic orbital wrapper was recovered in 14 months, driven primarily by elimination of return handling costs. The theoretical payback of 7.2 months was extended by a 6\u2011month ramp\u2011up period that included operator learning curve, production volume adjustment, and delayed realization of full labor savings.<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Savings Category<\/th>\n<th>Annual Value<\/th>\n<th>Calculation Basis<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Return elimination<\/td>\n<td>USD 43,200<\/td>\n<td>8% of 12,000 packages\/year \u00d7 average USD 45\/unit (client\u2019s product\u2011mix average, unaudited estimate; values may vary \u00b115% based on actual return volume and product mix)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Film waste reduction<\/td>\n<td>USD 2,550<\/td>\n<td>200 rolls\/year \u00d7 USD 85\/roll \u00d7 15% waste reduction<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Labor reallocation<\/td>\n<td>USD 18,000<\/td>\n<td>0.5 FTE freed from intervention tasks (shift supervisor estimate)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Total annual savings<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>USD 63,750<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>ROI calculation:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Theoretical payback: USD 38,000 \u00f7 USD 63,750\/year = <strong>0.6 years (7.2 months)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Actual payback: <strong>14 months<\/strong> due to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Ramp\u2011up period (months 1\u20133):<\/strong> Production ran at 60% of target volume while operators achieved proficiency on the HMI. Return rate dropped to 2% during this phase.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Training curve (months 4\u20136):<\/strong> Full production volume achieved but labor savings were partial as two operators remained dedicated to the machine for supervision.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Full steady state (month 7 onward):<\/strong> All savings realized at 100%.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Sensitivity analysis \u2014 ROI period variation under different conditions:<\/strong><\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Scenario<\/th>\n<th>Payback Period<\/th>\n<th>Key Assumptions<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Baseline (actual)<\/td>\n<td>14 months<\/td>\n<td>Single shift, 6\u2011month ramp\u2011up, average unit value USD 45<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Two\u2011shift operation from day one<\/td>\n<td>9 months<\/td>\n<td>Double production volume, same fixed investment<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Unit value USD 35 (lower product mix)<\/td>\n<td>18 months<\/td>\n<td>Return value sensitivity \u2013 22% lower per\u2011unit savings<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Unit value USD 55 (higher product mix)<\/td>\n<td>11 months<\/td>\n<td>Return value sensitivity \u2013 22% higher per\u2011unit savings<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>12% return rate (worst case observed)<\/td>\n<td>9 months<\/td>\n<td>If baseline return rate exceeded the 8% average<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>4% return rate (best case observed)<\/td>\n<td>No payback<\/td>\n<td>If baseline returns were lower, automation may not justify investment<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Non\u2011financial impact:<\/strong> The client\u2019s delivery reliability rating improved from 92% to 100% after eliminating returns. This performance metric directly contributed to securing two new automotive\u2011sector contracts requiring zero\u2011defect delivery certification.<\/p>\n<h2>\ud83c\udfd7\ufe0f Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Q: How does the automatic orbital wrapper integrate with an existing conveyor line?<\/strong><br \/>\nThe machine is mounted between two existing conveyor segments using adjustable feet and side rails. No floor\u2011layout modification is required. The standard conveyor height of 870 mm from floor is compatible; deviations of \u00b150 mm can be accommodated with riser plates. Photoelectric sensors interface with the existing PLC via digital I\/O (24V DC) or Ethernet\/IP.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q: What maintenance schedule is required for the roll sealing machine?<\/strong><br \/>\nDaily: Visual inspection of film path and seal bar cleanliness. Weekly: Lubrication of orbital ring bearings (2\u2011point grease fitting). Monthly: Seal bar temperature calibration check. Quarterly: Pre\u2011stretch roller surface inspection and replacement if worn. The machine\u2019s mean time between failures (MTBF) for the orbital drive is 8,000 operating hours; seal bar heater elements are rated for 5,000 cycles.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q: Is the machine compatible with different film types beyond LLDPE?<\/strong><br \/>\nYes. The servo\u2011controlled pre\u2011stretch system can be reprogrammed for film types with different elongation properties: LLDPE (typical 200\u2013300% pre\u2011stretch), PVC (100\u2013150%), or paper\u2011based wraps (minimal pre\u2011stretch). Film width range: 300\u2013500 mm; core diameter: 50 mm or 76 mm standard. The seal bar temperature range of 150\u2013200\u00b0C accommodates different film melt points. A changeover between film types requires 30 minutes for recipe adjustment and seal bar temperature stabilization.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q: How does the machine handle packages at the extremes of the size range (200 mm OD and 360 mm OD) without manual adjustment?<\/strong><br \/>\nThe PLC stores 12 recipe slots, each with parameters for OD \u00d7 axial length \u00d7 weight \u00d7 film tension. Photoelectric sensors detect package presence and start the wrapping cycle; a second sensor measures package OD by triangulation and selects the appropriate recipe. The servo\u2011driven pre\u2011stretch unit adjusts film tension dynamically within 200 milliseconds of recipe selection. Changeover between recipes is automatic and completes in under 5 seconds\u2014no operator input required.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q: What happens if the film runs out mid\u2011wrap?<\/strong><br \/>\nThe ultrasonic film\u2011end sensor detects low film (10% remaining) and triggers an HMI alarm before the roll is depleted. If film does run out during a wrap, the machine completes the current rotation (if at least 4 layers are applied) and then stops with an alarm. A splice station is integrated for joining a new roll to the tail of the depleted roll, allowing restart in under 90 seconds.<\/p>\n<h2>\ud83d\udcc8 Purchase\u2011Decision Checklist<\/h2>\n<p>When evaluating an automatic roll sealing machine for direct roving glass packages, verify these seven parameters with the supplier:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Package size range:<\/strong> Maximum OD \u2265 360 mm; minimum OD \u2264 200 mm. Axial length adjustable from 200 mm to 600 mm. Confirm wrapper ring diameter exceeds max OD by at least 100 mm for clearance.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Weight capacity:<\/strong> Rated for <strong>5\u201340 kg<\/strong> without manual tension adjustment. Verify conveyor drive motor torque is adequate for heaviest packages at full line speed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Film compatibility:<\/strong> Must handle <strong>18\u2011micron LLDPE stretch film<\/strong> at <strong>200% pre\u2011stretch<\/strong>. Confirm pre\u2011stretch unit is servo\u2011controlled (not mechanical dancer) for tension precision. Film width: 300\u2013500 mm.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Seal bar specification:<\/strong> Heat seal bar with closed\u2011loop temperature control range of <strong>170\u2013190\u00b0C<\/strong> and dwell time \u22641 second. Verify seal strength meets ASTM D882 or internal standard.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conveyor integration interface:<\/strong> Machine footprint must match your conveyor width and height. Confirm sensor type (photoelectric, inductive) and I\/O protocol (digital 24V DC, Ethernet\/IP, Profinet). Request dimensional drawing with machine placement tolerances.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Changeover logic:<\/strong> PLC\u2011based recipe storage for at least <strong>12 SKU profiles<\/strong> (OD \u00d7 weight \u00d7 film tension). Changeover time \u22645 minutes when switching recipe groups. Verify that changeover is automatic without manual sensor repositioning.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Film\u2011end alarm system:<\/strong> Must provide automatic stop or HMI alert before film roll is fully depleted. Recommend ultrasonic or optical sensor with adjustable threshold. Confirm that an incomplete\u2011wrap prevention routine is enabled (minimum layers verified before conveyor release).<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A mid\u2011sized fiberglass producer producing direct roving glass packages for construction and automotive supply chains eliminated 8% product returns by integrating an automatic orbital roll sealing machine. The solution achieved 100% tight containment across packages ranging 200\u2013360 mm OD and 5\u201340 kg, cut film waste by 15%, and recovered the USD 38,000 investment within 14 [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17038,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"A mid\u2011sized fiberglass producer producing direct roving glass packages for construction and automotive supply chains eliminated 8% product returns by integrating an automatic orbital roll sealing machine. The solution achieved 100% tight containment across packages ranging 200\u2013360 mm OD and 5\u201340 kg, cut film waste by 15%, and recovered the USD 38,000 investment within 14 months through eliminated returns, reduced film consumption, and freed operator capacity.","_seopress_robots_index":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Carpet-roll-shrinking-machine1.webp","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1392],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17028","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-roll-sealing-machine"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17028"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17028\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17039,"href":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17028\/revisions\/17039"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17038"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fhopepack.com\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}